Employee Pay in Focus: Transactional vs Strategic Pay Practices
Differences abound between transactional and strategic human resources, but even if the distinctions are clear to HR generalists, these terms get a little fuzzy when it comes to employee pay matters. Nonetheless, it’s important to understand the distinctions as these can be important to establishing the right pay practices and policies to keep your organization market-competitive. Let’s look at some critical differences between transactional and strategic approaches to employee pay, and answer some frequently asked questions that can help bring this subject into focus: Characteristics of Transactional Employee Pay Transactional employee pay practices tend to be short-term (or, for that matter, often shortsighted). They address situations but don’t address the “big picture.” They tend to be stop-gap in nature; interim solutions that might still need permanent strategic solutions down the road. Here are some common employee pay situations that are short-term and transactional in nature, rather than long-term and strategic: Hiring new employees at just above what they are being paid with their current employer Bringing new employees into the organization at a pay rate above existing employees to make sure the position gets filled Awarding merit increases without performing any proactive analysis just because they fit in budget Utilizing loose descriptions of job functions Using free salary data or letting employees drive the pay narrative with potentially misleading or inaccurate data from the internet Characteristics of Strategic Employee Pay Strategic employee pay practices tend to be longer-term solutions. They take the big picture into account and take the long view toward continuing marketplace competitiveness. Here are some common employee pay situations that are longer-term and strategic in nature, rather than short-term and transactional: Placing new employees in a market-validated pay range and comparing their history to others in the same or similar position for proper pay placement Evaluating and adjusting pay for current employees as needed when new hires must be brought in at higher rates Conducting a discrimination analysis before approving merit increases and address related issues proactively Utilizing job descriptions with clear responsibilities and standards for minimum as well as desired experience levels and education requirements Securing third-party published and scrubbed employer data or using a compensation consultant to secure salary data Answering Frequently Asked Questions to Clarify Transactional vs Strategic Employee Pay Practices Question: How can we bring new hires in using the prevailing market range when current employees are below market? Answer: First, think of your pay range in thirds: The lowest third of the pay range would apply to new and untested employees with little to no experience. The middle level would apply to fully proficient employees with several years of experience. The upper third is for seasoned employees with sustained performance over many years as well as a lot of experience. Obviously, you’ll need to have key information to properly place new employees into the appropriate pay range. For example, how much relevant experience will they bring to the job? Three years of experience? Four? None? You’ll then need to consider your current employees and align the new employee’s pay with other similarly situated employees. For instance, if a current employee has been in the job 4 years and came to you with no previous experience and the new employee brings 4 years of prior experience, you should pay these employees approximately the same. If you need to bring that new employee in higher than the existing employee because the market demands it, keep in mind when your merit awards will occur. If they are just a few months away, the current employee’s pay may exceed the new employee’s pay with their merit increase. If you just awarded merit increases, you may need to increase the existing employee’s pay to avoid creating discriminatory pay practices. You may also have to budget an increase for current employees and then execute the pay increases as soon as possible. You could also offer the new employee a sign-on bonus payable in various payments to keep the regular rates of current and new employees aligned. This leads us to the next question: Question: How can we realign existing compensation to market levels with minimal impact to financials? Answer: Tough question. It helps to budget for market-related increases each year. If that hasn’t been your practice and the pay ranges have fallen behind, you might provide increases every six months until you can get employee pay where needed. For employees below pay-range minimums, you can give merit increases first and then make a market adjustment if needed to help them reach the new minimum. Finally, you can use bonus programs, known as “variable pay,” in addition to base pay. Variable pay benchmarks must be re-earned each measurement period based on results. This enables you to hold merit increases in check; this can be important because merit increases permanently increase salary levels as well as benefits associated with base pay, such as life insurance, short-term disability, long-term disability, and sometimes retirement plans. Bonuses, on the other hand, are single pay-outs that do not normally increase base pay levels and related benefit costs for benefits (unless otherwise included per your benefit plan documents). Be sure to check your plan documents to clearly understand the definition of compensation before using bonus plans. Which naturally begs this question: Question: Why is a properly designed strategic pay program important to an organization? Answer: Among the many reasons are that a well-designed strategic employee pay program: Provides appropriate pay ranges for recruitment Promotes accurate job descriptions Provides a basis for determining the external value of jobs to market Provides baselines for reviewing employee performance and rewarding desired behaviors Ensures costs are maintained and managed appropriately Helps reduce turnover through improved employee morale and engagement when pay is not a dissatisfier and there are no pay equity issues The Bottom Line: It’s important to strategically plan your employee pay programs so you can attract and retain your top talent. Recognize that your employees are an investment and not an expense. The time and money it takes
Rethinking Age in Hiring
We recently sent an email to our BEST BRIEFS newsletter subscribers on the topic of ageism, and it definitely touched a nerve. Here is the original email content, followed by some of the comments we received on the subject. Our Original Message On January 20th, President Biden was sworn in and is now officially the oldest President the U.S. has ever had at 78 years old. A few weeks later, a 43-year-old Quarterback, with a 68-year-old Head Coach, and an 82-year-old Offensive Consultant, won the Super Bowl. These events alone should have us rethink ageism, but unfortunately, it is alive and well, and COVID has made matters worse. Studies show that workers ages 55 and older have experienced increased ageism from employers, particularly amid the pandemic. As people start to enter their 50s, they are more attuned to discrimination in the workplace. So much so that 58% of workers aged 50 or older have noticed age discrimination firsthand. Yet they’re known as being the most engaged in the workplace, not to mention the most experienced. Though our article on the topic of ageism (“Focusing on Youth in Hiring is Hurting Your Organizational Health”) was published before COVID, the point remains – it is time to rethink age in hiring, especially in industries (i.e., horticulture) where experience and qualified talent is increasingly becoming difficult to secure. After all, where are the Mentors and Coaches badly needed by younger generations to be found? Comments We heard from several business leaders on this topic, and here are a few of their comments. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Personally, I achieved the most in my 50’s and 60’s: I wrote two of my three books, spoke 22 times across Canada and the U.S. won an award for Best U.S. Speaker in Canada from TEC, a Canadian CEO peer group, won five Best Place to Work and two diversity awards for United Way. I believe that individuals have to shake off society’s negative messages about getting older. We have to create our own “the best is yet to come mindset.” Oh, and my last book was all about companies that have strategies to maximize the creativity, productivity, and value of 50+ and previously retired employees. We make our own luck—and that applies to the organizations that don’t waste this valuable resource! • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • You are spot-on for highlighting ageism! It is the 60-year-old elephant in the room. I have been in meetings where it was disguised as “he/she probably isn’t up to date with technology as a reason for not considering an otherwise qualified candidate.” The older generation invented the computer. We darn sure have the intellectual capacity to learn some of the updates. Also, was there when the “Are you sure he/she will fit in with the younger members of our team?” Ageism comes in many flavors and is very active in today’s job market. Employers are crying for skilled workers who show up on time and give their best but overlook an audience right before them, ready and willing to contribute. Ageism is a cancer in the workplace. My new mantra is: I N D Y stands for “I’m Not Done Yet!” • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Special thanks to those who commented on our piece. Please complete the form below if you wish to subscribe to future BEST BRIEFS newsletters. In this unprecedented business environment and labor market, it may also be time to shift your thinking on recruiting and make an investment to bring on an experienced partner. One that can help you acquire the right talent and put your company in a position to grow. We can help. If your company is ready to strategically address, improve, and invest in the hiring of the most important part of any company – its people — contact us today!
To Be Strategic or Transactional? That is the Question
The Case for Human Resources in Strategic Planning Ask most business leaders and professionals, and they will describe human resources in transactional terms. “They are the department that hires people, fires people, manages our benefit plans, and tells us how much we can pay people.” A lot to unpack there for sure, but that perception misses the mark entirely. While it is true that human resources has a lot of transactional components, it is no different from any other department or function within a business. For example, consider your Accounting Department. Arguably it is one of the most critical roles within the business as it has the power of the purse. Its transactional tasks include logging debits and credits into the general ledger, the monthly close process, development of quarterly and annual statements, or logging receipts and outflows through the AR/AP departments. Human Resources also has its share of transactional components. Someone has to enter payroll weekly or biweekly, manage open enrollment, conduct onboarding, or even manage recruitment requisitions. If that is the extent of the value leadership perceives human resources brings to the table, there is a lot they are missing. We would argue that perception is precisely what is holding a business back from achieving its fullest potential. At its core, a business is its people. Try starting a business without any people at all? You can’t do it. You know why? You are a person. If you start a business, even a company of one, say a single shingle consulting business, then a human is part of that business. Humans are the brainchild of every initiative and action internally and externally to the company. Even with all the automation being implemented today, from software to robots, people must maintain, repair, and monitor them to ensure they continue to perform as intended. There is a strategic component that is often overlooked, and it begins with strategic workforce planning. When your business develops its strategic plan, you look at a 3-to-5-year horizon. With the fast pace of change in business today, it is almost always the case that many of the roles, skills, and competencies needed to fulfill that strategic vision do not currently exist. Absent strategic workforce planning, that vision is doomed to fail from the start. Strategic HR professionals can work closely with executive management to flesh out a human capital plan according to organizational goals. Such a plan may include developing career pathing to move key talent from current roles that will be going away and into the new positions that will be created. It may also have a compensation analysis and benchmarking strategy to determine what to pay roles that don’t yet exist in your business (or even, possibly, anywhere). Plus, learning development programs to teach existing employees the very knowledge and skills they need to succeed in roles they don’t even know are coming, employee relations strategies that will drive engagement and retain key talent, and manage the impact on your people as the organization marches towards that strategic vision. None of this is transactional. All of it requires a very strategic and planned approach aligned with the organization’s strategic plan, outcomes, and goals. As with many areas of your business, there are laws and regulations involved. The EPA places restrictions on the output of carcinogens that can be expelled by smokestacks of factories or waste that can be dumped into rivers and streams. The SEC restricts actions they consider insider trading. Even your sales teams have restrictions to protect consumers from “bait-and-switch” tactics. Human resources is no different— well, maybe a little different. Employment law is a fickle beast, constantly weaving and bobbing, changing all the time. A great example is a recent court case in Minnesota (Hill v. City of Plainview) that appears to have upended decades of legal precedent about the use of disclaimer statements that prevent an Employee Handbook from being interpreted as an employment contract. To the untrained and uninitiated in the ways of human resources, it can seem that the application of employment law bends with the proverbial wind. Though it is rare when significant landmark laws are passed (i.e., Affordable Care Act, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or even the Civil Rights Act), the way many of the laws are interpreted by the courts is what drives the most significant adjustments by businesses to comply with employment law. With the right strategic HR leadership in place, appropriate plans for implementing changes to employment law can be made that will protect the organization from costly fees, fines, and government-imposed remedies. Strategic human resources leadership can also guide your business by executing transactional HR tasks and even positively impacting the bottom line. For example, there is a time in the business lifecycle when outsourcing transactional HR tasks are more cost-effective. That does not mean every aspect of human resources should get outsourced. That would be a huge mistake. It means that a strategic HR leader should guide or even lead the research, selection, and implementation of an appropriate Administrative Service Organization (ASO) or Preferred Employer Organization (PEO) to handle these transactions. That strategic HR leader should lead the selection and implementation of appropriate Learning and Development (L&D) programs, develop and direct a total rewards strategy, and even the selection and relationship management of the suitable recruiting partners to align human capital needs with the strategic workforce plan. As an economy of scale is reached internally due to headcount and revenue size, it becomes more economically feasible to bring back the human resource tasks formerly outsourced to an ASO or PEO. The organization will further benefit from greater command and control over transactional HR tasks and align better with corporate strategy. There is no magic universal breakpoint to determine when to do this. You will have to look at your business’s demands, nature of employment, industry, and geographic reach as each impacts a company differently. However, the right strategic HR leader will make the correct business case, leading to the most beneficial outcomes. It’s a new year. We have
Who wants to be President?
Career goal setting and development. Do you have a specific career vision of being the President of a company someday? Are you working on adding professional skill sets that will enable you to take on a C-Level role? Do you have a career dream? As a company, have you invested in a definitive training and development program to foster your next generation of company leaders? The horticultural industry is just one of many that need more leaders now and progressively into the future. The number of retirements coming up is staggering. Did you know that there are over 100 owners of companies retiring soon who have no clear leader to succeed them? That is just in horticulture. Overall, 60% of the professionals in the agriculture industry are over 55. As an industry, we endured a period with historically low numbers of students and professionals interested in pursuing a green industry career. This period has created an employee talent gap in what would often be considered the next traditional leadership group. This group is talented and knowledgeable, but it is merely a matter of supply and demand. There are just not enough leaders to take over, and not enough have been provided the necessary leadership training. Throughout every sector, demographic, and role in the green industry and many other industries, there are too few individuals who have had a specific desire and career focus to run a company. Compare this to the financial or IT sectors where a high volume of professionals have an early passion and focus on driving their careers to their industry’s top leadership roles. It is surprising how few professionals have had an initial desire to be a President of a company. A dynamic affecting this is the sheer number of family-held companies where leadership has traditionally been passed to 2nd or 3rd generations. While this is admirable, it has also tempered the career aspirations of those who are not part of the family. We are now at a tipping point where there are fewer generations to pass leadership roles to, causing new and challenging exit planning options for the current leaders. How do we address this? From the mutual effort of individuals and companies. Encourage students and early career professionals to dream and envision being a company leader. Leadership is not for the faint of heart with all its responsibilities and challenges. However, we need more professionals to dream about wanting to run a company. Ask yourself if you have allowed yourself to dream about this type of role? To have more leaders, we need more professionals desiring to take on this level of leadership. With that desire comes the awareness that a person needs to embrace continual learning with curiosity and accept certain sacrifices driving their career to achieve top leadership positions. This could include putting in longer hours some days, the ability to relocate as necessary, and volunteering to take on new tasks or help in other departments when they are shorthanded. Academically, technical knowledge is essential. Many excellent educational institutions produce technically knowledgeable students. However, many lack focused programs on developing company leadership with curriculums geared to business and management. We rightly celebrate our grower interns, but we should also celebrate those doing horticulture industry internships in sales, marketing, accounting, or human resources. Have a professional growth plan. If you do want to take the helm of a company someday, identify in yourself the knowledge and industry skillsets you need to master, so you are ready. Proactively take charge of gaining the knowledge and experience you lack rather than relying on others. There is as much onus on companies to be a part of increased leadership development. Yes, this does require an investment. Begin to balance your team’s professional development with your automation budget. No matter how automated, it still takes strong professionals for a company to realize success. Many assessment tools are available that will help a company identify individuals with leadership behaviors. These tools identify a career plan for those individuals that will infuse them with the skillsets needed to become a strong leader in the future. Does your company have ongoing career development planning, which includes rotation through different departments or functions? At the very least, does the company invest in continual education or training programs focused on improving communication, soft skills, sales, marketing, financial, operations, or supply chain knowledge? Encourage and support your company’s professionals to become active within your industry via associations, seminars, or other educational and networking events. Don’t be afraid of losing this talent by this exposure. Professionals who know their company is investing fully in their growth are much less likely to leave. Employees who feel stifled in their development will leap at the chance for growth elsewhere. No company has an endless budget, but a company can apply strategies that do not require a monetary investment – transparency in your business and delegation of responsibilities. Openness with your employees about all facets of the business directly correlates to increasing their professional growth. For example, companies applying the Great Game of Business approach to transparency have more engaged and motivated employees concerning their career progression. Pairing high potential employees with positive mentors will also benefit the mentor themselves increasing organizational talent strength. Encourage delegating responsibilities and not micro-managing those assigned these tasks. This must start from the highest leadership levels. Current leaders – ask yourself if too many business decisions are run through you, or have you honestly delegated to your team decisions without hovering over them? FYI – your business’s valuation increases when delegating decision making abilities and becoming less owner-centric. Growing the number of leaders is critical to the future success of any industry. The gap can be closed with more professionals who desire to run a company and put their plan in place. Couple this with companies providing increased focus on training and development, and we have set the stage for increased industry success that becomes sustainable for many years to
Strategic HR
How Small to Medium-Sized Businesses Can Get the Most Out of the HR Function “For the world is changing: I feel it in the water, I feel it in the earth, and I smell it in the air.” These words were spoken in the movie and written in the book “Lord of the Rings,” and very accurately sums up what is happening in our world today. The fast pace of change for businesses due to recent social unrest, economic recession, and a global pandemic shined a light on just how unprepared so many companies, regardless of size, industry, or sector, were when it came to crisis management. If there is one lesson small to mid-sized business leaders have learned, it likely is the value, importance, and absolute need for strategic human resource professionals. Years ago, when I joined an underground utility company as the HR Manager, I knew nothing about the business. If I were going to add value to the organization, I had to understand the business— what they did, how they did it, their competition, and how the company could compete. Only then could I collaborate with superintendents on staffing planning, project managers around their pipeline of projects that would feed the revenue wheel, and the employees to understand how to keep them engaged and reduce turnover. In small to medium-sized businesses, many business leaders struggle with understanding the strategic partnership that HR can have within the organization. This is too often because HR does not properly understand the business and because many business leaders only understand the transactional support HR provides. Many business leaders determine a need for dedicated HR personnel only when the transactions become more burdensome than they are willing or able to handle. For HR to demonstrate the strength of the strategic partnership, they must be intimately familiar with all aspects of your business, understand when to outsource transactional tasks, and when to bring those back in-house. To get the most out of your HR department or function, business leaders should differentiate the transactional tasks of HR from their strategic partnership with the business. Transactions can be outsourced and automated. Many solutions are available, some of which were shared in a previous article, Resistance is Futile, that addresses many affordable HR compliance solutions (the primary transactional tasks of HR) for small to medium-sized businesses. The low to no-cost solutions available are numerous, and when employed, these services free up the HR team member(s) to become true strategic partners. There is a time in the business life cycle where outsourcing transactional tasks is the right strategic move, and when bringing such tasks in-house is best. A May 8, 2019, Gartner article, Gartner Survey Reveals That CEO Priorities Are Slowly Shifting to Meet Rising Growth Challenges, indicates that in the annual Gartner 2019 CEO and Senior Business Executive Survey, “a growing number of CEOs… deem financial priorities important, especially profitability improvement.” The survey also states that “at the same time, mentions of financial priorities, cost, and risk management also increased.” The appropriate treatment of transactional HR tasks can be a huge help in addressing such concerns in your organization. Outsourcing can stabilize cash flow, especially in a seasonal business, make it more predictable and easier on the budget. It can introduce automation, such as self-service portals, reporting, and file maintenance. Outsourcing transactional HR tasks can even shift the risks of non-compliance to a vendor, potentially saving your business hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines, fees, and government-imposed remedies. Typically, much later in the business life cycle, insourcing these transactional tasks is the right strategic move. It will provide more control of data, improve the quality of service transactions, develop deeper metrics and tracking, and improve innovation and creativity around HR initiatives. Due to economies of scale, it may even be more cost-effective to insource than outsource. Knowing the right time to do each is somewhat challenging, but HR becomes a more strategic partner to your business when done right. To help HR be more strategic, now that the transactional tasks have been appropriately addressed, we need to immerse them in the business fully. Take HR under your wing and teach them the business from the ground up. Company history is part of that, but only a small part. For example, in horticulture, your HR function needs to understand what growers do and what various crops and systems challenge them. They need to know the role and responsibility of those leading operations, whether they are working with plants in a field or a greenhouse, and the relationship between customer service, sales, product development, marketing, and operations. HR should visit and have a chance to shadow every department or function within your business, meet the key leaders, and have a chance to talk with entry-level employees. Invite HR to meet with key customers to understand this relationship and the customer’s challenges your company is trying to help them solve. Expose them to the entire industry through the various trade show events and conferences such as Cultivate, MANTS, Far West, or the Plug & Cutting Conference so they can learn about all the companies that make up the horticulture industry as well as interact with other HR leaders to share best practices. Expecting HR to stay in their silo, their office, or behind their cubicle separates them from the business. It hinders their innovation and creativity when tasked with solving real business problems. Strategic elements that HR brings include assisting with developing the organization’s strategic and tactical plan, organizational development and design, strategic workforce planning, succession planning, and learning and development. Even the development of compensation and benefits programs, collectively the total rewards program, is strategic. In a March 14, 2019 article by The Predictive Index, Top CEO Priorities Are Business Strategy and Talent Strategy, the top two priority concerns are… well, as the title states… business strategy and talent strategy, two core areas addressed with an HR function that performs a strategic role. Add to that the January 17,