Employee Engagement: “Did I Stutter?”
Poor Stanley. The lovable curmudgeon on the still popular TV Show “The Office” wants to be left alone so he can do his crossword puzzle in the middle of a company brainstorming meeting in peace. His boss, bumbling Michael Scott, tells him to put his game down and join the group. Stanley replies with a firm, “No.” Michael then says, “Stanley, we’re havin’ a little brainstorm session.” Stanley then proceeds to cut him off and says loudly and firmly enough so the whole room can hear it, “Did I stutter?” Michael becomes so embarrassed and flustered that he calls a quick end to the meeting so he can grab a glass of water. The episode continues with Michael and Stanley trying to come to an understanding and better define the boss and employee relationship. Do you think Stanley is engaged in his work? Do you think he is committed and connected to his organization? Do you think Michael may have something to do with that? According to SHRM, executives from around the world say that enhancing employee engagement is one of their top five global business goals. As a critical business driver in today’s highly competitive environment, employee engagement can have a significant impact on your company’s bottom line. According to The ISR Employee Engagement Report, “Companies with high levels of employee engagement improved 19.2% in operating income while companies with low levels of employee engagement declined 32.7% over the study period.” Is it any wonder that increasing employee engagement is a top-five global business goal? A highly engaged workforce is the key to retaining top talent within your organization, driving high levels of customer satisfaction and loyalty for sustained growth. However, how do you know if your workforce is engaged or not? Then once you identify low engagement as an issue, how can you address the problem before your bottom line starts to suffer? Is My Workforce Engaged? That is a good question because we often confuse job satisfaction and happiness with employee engagement. Therefore, the thought goes that if my people are happy, then they’re engaged. However, it is possible to have a happy and satisfied employee who is not actively involved in their work or committed to the company. According to Kevin Kruse, the author of Engagement 2.0, “Someone can be happy at work, but not ‘engaged.’ They might be happy because they are lazy and it’s a job with not much to do. They might be happy talking to all their work friends and enjoying the free cafeteria food. They might be happy to have a free company car. They might just be a happy person. But! Just because they’re happy doesn’t mean they are working hard on behalf of the company. They can be happy and unproductive.” Thus, happiness and job satisfaction are not useful indicators of employee engagement. It could be they have found a comfortable place to “hide” in your organization without the level of commitment and caring that could help propel your company to the next level. Gallup regularly conducts surveys on the topic of employee engagement, and they have found that nearly 70% of the workforce today is disengaged, causing employees and businesses to suffer dramatically due to increased turnover, low commitment, and reduced productivity. How to Address Low Engagement? Measure employee engagement each quarter to provide closer-to-real-time data about how your staff views the organization, their managers (who have a significant impact on their overall engagement), and their roles within the company. The powerful “heat map” it creates shows leaders exactly where problem areas exist as they slice and dice the data into targeted workforce segments (by the department, location, generation, tenure, and more). Scientifically based employee feedback surveys allow you to take a deeper dive into the company culture and pinpoint the root causes of disengagement. By collecting anonymous feedback regularly, it gives teams and leaders real-time insights from scientific data that can then be used to impact change quickly. If you’re looking to bring more meaning to your employees’ work experience and increase employee engagement and productivity, then start acting on a proven and predictive data format. We can help you build an action plan to drive high engagement and performance, which will impact your bottom line and your ability to compete better and win. In August 2019, close to 200 business executives met and issued a statement on “The Purpose of a Corporation,” radically stating that companies should no longer advance only the interests of shareholders but also invest in their employees. It could be a reaction to a changing economic environment and record low unemployment. It could also be that business leaders finally understand the importance of employee engagement. That’s right—Did I stutter? SOURCES: “Did I Stutter?” The Office, written by Brent Forrester & Justin Spitzer, directed by Randall Einhorn, 2008; Gallup Employee Engagement Poll, August 26, 2018; The ISR Employee Engagement Report by Towers Perrin; Engagement 2.0 by Kevin Kruse, Createspace Independent Pub, 2012.
Don’t Let Your Succession Plan be a Bad Sequel
When movies are made correctly and have appeal, there is no denying the impact. They win awards, inspire the audience, and fill the pockets of the movie studios. However, these blockbusters can also be the platforms for some of the biggest flops on record. After a successful movie the audience wonders what will come next, and the studio wonders how they can keep the franchise going? Good sequels can be important, expanding on worlds and delving deeper into plot lines, but a bad sequel can strain our love for the movie by losing key actors and directors, and recycling plot lines and jokes. One such example is director Allan Arkush succeeding Harold Ramis to direct Caddyshack II, which flopped and earned a 4% score on Rotten Tomatoes. Compare this to the 1980 original classic, which received 74%, and you can see the difference. The same thing can happen in business. Once it is time for a CEO or business owner to retire, the whole company can be put on edge. Many of the employees are thinking about what happens next. Are they left having to find a new job or can a new CEO/owner create the next bright sequel for the company? It might not be possible for the Dan Ackroyd’s of the world to replace the Bill Murray’s in an iconic role, but with the right director they have a better chance to make the role their own and not some cheap imitation of the past. A study from the Exit Planning Institute shows that 76% of business owners plan to transition their business in the next 10 years. However, 83% do not have a transition plan in place. Coincidentally, lack of planning is the number one reason why businesses fail. During succession planning a business needs to be transitional, meaning ready to pass leadership onto another. A business also needs to be transactional, meaning maintaining a high level of value and low debt, so it is attractive to a potential buyer. The Script The key factor that determines a successful succession is planning. One should begin this planning the moment they obtain leadership and/or ownership because succession does not happen only when one retires. The only way to beat the worst-case scenario is to plan for it and pray it never happens. With a thorough plan a company will increase in enterprise value, secure future worth, and reduce potential stress. Without a plan, the decrease in value could be substantial. According to the Exit Planning Institute, 80% of companies are simply not able to be sold and only 8% of companies actually get their asking price. When creating a sequel, the studio needs to consider how popular the first movie was and if a second would generate enough revenue. Then they choose a director, receive a budget, write the script, and cast all the roles before sending the project off for production. The same considerations need to be undertaken in succession planning. This requires weighing all your options for a successor. Most people look just to the C-suite, but is there any outside hire or fresh face in the company that should be considered? You also need to budget. How much is this transition going to cost? Are there going to be other changes that will take place that need to be considered? Next comes the company plan. Is the new successor going to use the same business model or create one of their own? The answers to these questions will help the company become more transition-ready. This means that all the transactional and transferable aspects have been fine-tuned and prepped for the next stage. In a movie you can usually tell when there will be a sequel. At the end of the movie you are left with either a cliffhanger or some unanswered questions. It is also easy to tell when a movie studio was not planning on doing a sequel but decided to release a shameless cash-grab. Typically, the sequels that are released after a movie that seemingly wrapped everything up and left no real questions are the ones that flop. Caddyshack II was a movie that did not need to be made and the director believed that enough people would enjoy it purely for the nostalgia and not notice the absence of all but one of the key characters. This lack of planning left the audience bored and consequently became one of the worst movies ever made. Your Sequel? Only careful planning and a sufficient amount of time can prevent you and your business from becoming a bad sequel. If a studio decides to make a sequel, you need to pick the “director” who wants to continue the growth of the company and lead it into the future. Budget? Focus on making the business more financially attractive so there is sufficient capital, investors, and/or potential buyers. Script? Engage in continual business and succession planning and make sure your key financial advisors, accountant, and lawyer are also involved. Casting? Work with an industry recruiter, consultant, or advisor to make sure you have the right people in the right roles. After all, your team needs to be as transition ready as your business. Succession planning is ultimately about the transaction of your life and not all sequels are bad. The Godfather II is arguably better than the first movie and is considered one of the best sequels, if not movies, of all time. Do you want to be a Caddyshack II or a Godfather II? The choice is yours and now is the time to get started. “Quiet on the set… Action!” SOURCES: PWC Family Business Survey; Exit Planning Institute; and Pew Research Center. The single largest transaction and transition of your life deserves special attention. Are you planning to exit and sell your business? Business Exit planning is quickly becoming a buzzword in the legal and financial communities. Your professional advisors position themselves to provide tax, risk management, wealth management, and contract preparation services.
Focusing on Youth in Hiring is Hurting Your Organizational Health
In the Fall of 1984, Ronald Reagan, at the time the oldest U.S. President in history, was in a fight for re-election. In his first debate with youthful challenger Walter Mondale, he appeared tired and lacking energy. Many began to question his stamina for the job. In the second debate, he was asked a question about his age and being able to function in tough circumstances and in a crisis. Without hesitation, Reagan said the lines that we wish would be used more by older candidates seeking a job today: “Not at all… and I want you to know that also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.” He never looked back and won re-election in a landslide. Underlying the humor of Reagan’s response (even Mondale laughed at the time) is the truth in his words. Do we, and organizations in general, consciously and/or subconsciously choose “youth and inexperience” over “experience and wisdom” to our detriment and even to the detriment of the younger employees we onboard? Are we missing training, coaching, mentoring, and even reverse mentoring opportunities that would ultimately lower turnover and benefit the entire organization? Is it time to rethink age in hiring, especially in the current “candidate’s market,” and get away from the misconceptions and perceived costs of hiring older workers and focus on the benefits? In Search of Experience and Wisdom “Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don’t mind, it doesn’t matter.” – Mark Twain Most can agree that experience and wisdom are good things, but there are clearly also times when age and health can lead to poor performance. On the flip side, performance in younger employees could be just as impacted by a lack of training (investment in your personnel), mentoring, and coaching, which could lead to increased turnover and impact the future of your entire organization. We recently placed a 61-year-old candidate into a client who simply couldn’t ignore the fact that she would make the entire department better. Instead of age being a negative, this particular person’s depth of work and life experience, high energy, and continual learning mindset, as well as the fact that she had been a coach and mentor to several in the same field for decades, became a major positive. She didn’t need training— she was going to become the trainer. The client saw that this was a resource that many of his Millennials could tap into, and concerns over age and longevity in the position were overcome. Too often as business leaders, we look for “shiny and new” over “tried and true.” On the flip side, the disdain that many in the Baby Boomers and Gen Xers have for Millennials (and vice versa) is not a new phenomenon. Saying that Millennials are more prone to leaving jobs and switching companies than previous generations is misleading. They leave jobs because they are young and new to the workforce, and there was probably little in the way of training investment, coaching, and mentoring to keep them there and get them through the rough patches. According to Pew Research and a study they did comparing Millennials to Gen Xers, the percentage of 18-to-35-year-old employees who stayed with their employers for 13 months or more was 63.4% for Millennials in 2016 and 59.9% for Gen Xers in 2000. In addition, the percentage of these same groups who had been with their employers for 5 years or more was 22% for Millennials in 2016 and 21.8% for Gen Xers in 2000. It is easy to form generalizations about generations and blame the Millennials for leaving because they do not “have a strong work ethic.” It is also envy, and we have all been there. Ask an all-star major league baseball player from the 70s or 80s if he wouldn’t want the salary of even the most mediocre ballplayer today? What about Millennials just entering the workforce out of college? According to Mike Brown and the “The Class of 2018 Career Report” conducted by LendEDU, 41.3% had already found a job, and of those, only 37% envision staying at that same job for over 3 years. 28% of those who had found a job envisioned staying at their job for up to 3 years, while 25% thought they would last 6 months to a year, and 10% said they would leave as soon as something better came along (click here for the full study at LendEDU). The research indicates that younger workers are leaving your company, not because they are “Millennials.” They are leaving because they don’t see the career path and opportunity they’re looking for, and they may indeed have higher expectations, or they simply need guidance. They may have been thrown into a position without proper onboarding or training and are learning simply by making mistakes, which can be soul-crushing. In a recent Udemy “Workplace Boredom Report,” 46% of employees are looking to leave their companies because of a lack of opportunity to learn new skills. This is when a more experienced and wise counterpart can provide the training, skills, career/life guidance, coaching, and patience that can help them learn the position, see their fit within the company, adapt to the culture, and see a future. Do you have a mentoring program? There is a wealth of company, industry, and subject knowledge in older workers that Millennials can tap into and that employers should value. Programs that enable knowledge transfer and connect younger and older workers have been found to have a high return on investment because of the impact they have on increasing retention rates, promotions, and overall employee satisfaction. There is also a benefit in reverse mentoring in which older executives are paired and mentored in turn by younger employees on technology, social media, and trends. After all, what organization couldn’t benefit from a free exchange of ideas, wisdom, and engagement between employees in different generations?
Employee Retention Issues? Look in the Mirror (Part 1)
Part 1 of 2-Part Series on the Important and Timely Issue of Employee Retention There is a saying that employees don’t leave companies, they leave managers. Today, they are leaving more than ever. According to recent U.S. Department of Labor statistics, the average tenure of an employee in the U.S. is now only 1.5 years. We have ample statistics that clearly indicate money is NOT the reason for employees leaving a company. They do not resign on impulse, or in a “Jerry Maguire” moment of anger, delirium, or a personal epiphany. When they decided to join your company, they initially saw the opportunity as a great fit for their career and wanted it to be a successful long run. Unfortunately, somehow, the wheels they thought fit came off. If you take the time to thoroughly investigate the true reason for their leaving – AND YOU SHOULD – you will likely uncover that it’s not the products, customers, industry, competition, location, coworkers, commit,e or tools they have at their disposal. IT’S THE LEADERSHIP! When employees or ex-employees grumble about “culture,” or that “communication is poor,” or express frustration at the lack of career progression and professional development, they are telling you that it is the leadership they are unhappy with and leaving. Clearly, company leaders are responsible for setting the culture, communication, and career development within a business. For the sake of your company, and more importantly, your people, take one moment as a leader and be brutally honest with yourself in answering these questions: Do you find yourself behind closed doors a good portion of the day as you strategize or execute in private? Do you put your personal gain over your employee’s best interest when making decisions? Do you consistently affix blame on the departing employee for “not following the process” or working hard or smart enough? (Have you ever blamed yourself?) Do you promise the “stars” in career progression, but consistently find an excuse why the company cannot deliver them? It’s time to look in the mirror and answer these questions. A “company” is a legal entity. A “business” is a collection of assets and liabilities. No one resigns because of that. It’s the decisions, the motivation, the atmosphere, the ethics, the support, the training, the vision, and the direction set by leadership that will properly engage employees to stay with you in a highly productive manner. If they are not engaged, then take another look in that mirror! The next time an employee resigns, resist your patterned behavior to shrug it off as “another underperformer who didn’t follow the process.” Take a moment to reflect in that mirror on what it actually is they are resigning from. Too many times it is not the departing employee who doesn’t “get it.” It’s not the company they are leaving. IT IS YOU! So you looked in the mirror and – employee retention issues are your fault. Admitting that is a good first step. Should you act immediately to improve employee retention challenges? Can’t you just add it to the projects scheduled later this year?” Check out these two recent findings published in a recent Kiplinger report as to why you should act NOW. Unemployment held at 4.1% in December 2017. Look for 3.8% by the end of 2018 as it becomes harder for employers to find suitable candidates. The short-term unemployment rate (less than six months) has fallen to its lowest level in 65 years. Further proof of a tightening labor market is evidenced by lots of job openings in certain sectors, including health care, food services, construction, transportation, and warehousing. Openings in health care and food services are at their highest level in 15 years. If you lead a company of 500 or fewer employees, the urgency is heightened. The shortage of qualified workers is starting to squeeze small businesses. In industries such as manufacturing and construction, many small firms are finding themselves forced to hike wages. Not just to lure new hires… many smalls need to pay more just to keep their current workers from jumping ship. The problem will only worsen later this year. The economy is accelerating, and many small businesses want to expand in order to cash in on rising orders. But those expansion plans will bump up against the constraints of a tight job market. What are retention or engagement warning indicators you should be looking for? According to the U.S. Department of Labor: 55% of Employees are currently searching for other job opportunities. 40% of organizations report that losing key employees is the top concern. 33% of new hires quit their job in the first 6 months. 33% of employees know within 1 week if they will stay with that company long term. What do the statistics look like for companies with highly engaged employees? They are: 2x more likely to remain with their current company. 3x as likely to do something good for the company that was not asked of them. In addition: 51% are more likely to have engaged employees when companies’ values are properly communicated, clear, and understood by all. 78% of employees communicate they would retain/stay longer with their current company if they could see a clear career path for their career. “So, how much is subpar employee retention costing my business?” Employee turnover costs include more than job posting fees and recruiter commissions. Some costs include, but are not limited to: Revenue loss from unfilled Jobs. Pre- & Post-employment administrative functions and expenses. Pre-employment screening and interviews for replacement hires. Training Costs for new hires and promotions. Loss of Productivity due to overworked remaining employees. Loss of knowledge transfer opportunity. Click here for the full list of 20 Retention Cost Metrics available upon request. To help you identify your company’s specific cost of retention, we found this calculator on bonus.ly that you may find helpful. Just remember to check the “assumptions” that these automated calculators use to make sure they accurately represent your company’s situation. Up Next: Click Here