Employee Pay in Focus: Transactional vs Strategic Pay Practices
Differences abound between transactional and strategic human resources, but even if the distinctions are clear to HR generalists, these terms get a little fuzzy when it comes to employee pay matters. Nonetheless, it’s important to understand the distinctions as these can be important to establishing the right pay practices and policies to keep your organization market-competitive. Let’s look at some critical differences between transactional and strategic approaches to employee pay, and answer some frequently asked questions that can help brings this subject into focus: Characteristics of Transactional Employee Pay Transactional employee pay practices tend to be short-term (or, for that matter, often shortsighted). They address situations but don’t address the “big picture.” They tend to be stop-gap in nature; interim solutions that might still need permanent strategic solutions down the road. Here are some common employee pay situations that are short-term and transactional in nature, rather than long-term and strategic: Hiring new employees just above what they are being paid with their current employer Bringing new employees into the organization at a pay rate above existing employees to make sure the position gets filled Awarding merit increases without performing any proactive analysis just because they fit in budget Utilizing loose descriptions of job functions Using free salary data or letting employees drive the pay narrative with potentially misleading or inaccurate data from the internet Characteristics of Strategic Employee Pay Strategic employee pay practices tend to be longer-term solutions. They take the big picture into account and take the long view toward continuing marketplace competitiveness. Here are some common employee pay situations that are longer-term and strategic in nature, rather than short-term and transactional: Placing new employees in a market-validated pay range and comparing their history to others in the same or similar position for proper pay placement Evaluating and adjusting pay for current employees as needed when new hires must be brought in at higher rates Conducting a discrimination analysis before approving merit increases and address related issues proactively Utilizing job descriptions with clear responsibilities and standards for minimum as well as desired experience levels and education requirements Securing third party published and scrubbed employer data or using a compensation consultant to secure salary data Answering Frequently Asked Questions to Clarify Transactional vs Strategic Employee Pay Practices Question: How can we bring new hires in using the prevailing market range when current employees are below market? Answer: First, think of your pay range in thirds: The lowest third of the pay range would apply to new and untested employees with little to no experience. The middle level would apply to fully proficient employees with several years of experience. The upper third is for seasoned employees with sustained performance over many years as well as a lot of experience. Obviously, you’ll need to have key information to properly place new employees into the appropriate pay range. For example, how much relevant experience will they bring to the job? Three years of experience? Four? None? You’ll then need to consider your current employees and align the new employee’s pay with other similarly situated employees. For instance, if a current employee has been in the job 4 years and came to you with no previous experience and the new employee brings 4 years of prior experience, you should pay these employees approximately the same. If you need to bring that new employee in higher than the existing employee because the market demands it, keep in mind when your merit awards will occur. If they are just a few months away, the current employee’s pay may exceed the new employee’s pay with their merit increase. If you just awarded merit increases, you may need to increase the existing employee’s pay to avoid creating discriminatory pay practices. You may also have to budget an increase for current employees and then execute the pay increases as soon as possible. You could also offer the new employee a sign-on bonus payable in various payments to keep the regular rates of current and new employees aligned. This leads us to the next question: Question: How can we realign existing compensation to market levels with minimal impact to financials? Answer: Tough question. It helps to budget for market-related increases each year. If that hasn’t been your practice and the pay ranges have fallen behind, you might provide increases every six months until you can get employee pay where needed. For employees below pay-range minimums, you can give merit increases first and then make a market adjustment if needed to help them reach the new minimum. Finally, you can use bonus programs, known as “variable pay,” in addition to base pay. Variable pay benchmarks must be re-earned each measurement period based on results. This enables you to hold merit increases in check; this can be important because merit increases permanently increase salary levels as well as benefits associated with base pay, such as life insurance, short-term disability, long-term disability, and sometimes retirement plans. Bonuses, on the other hand, are single pay-outs that do not normally increase base pay levels and related benefit costs for benefits (unless otherwise included per your benefit plan documents). Be sure to check your plan documents to clearly understand the definition of compensation before using bonus plans. Which naturally begs this question: Question: Why is a properly designed strategic pay program important to an organization? Answer: Among the many reasons are that a well-designed strategic employee pay program: Provides appropriate pay ranges for recruitment Promotes accurate job descriptions Provides a basis for determining the external value of jobs to market Provides baselines for reviewing employee performance and rewarding desired behaviors Ensures costs are maintained and managed appropriately Helps reduce turnover through improved employee morale and engagement when pay is not a dissatisfier and there are no pay equity issues The Bottom Line: It’s important to strategically plan your employee pay programs so you can attract and retain your top talent. Recognize that your employees are an investment and not an expense. The time and money it takes
Lessons from the Tank: Can Your Employees Be the Next Scrub Daddy?
One of the most popular and interesting reality TV shows today is Shark Tank. For over ten years, it has been the show where wealthy, mostly self-made, business professionals help a small business owner achieve their entrepreneurial dreams. There have been many successful products introduced to the consumer market after appearing on Shark Tank. Take the Scrub Daddy®, for example. The concept is simple (a smiley-faced, reusable sponge in which the texture and function change with water temperature), but it has sold over 10 million units, and the growth continues. To date, the Scrub Daddy® is one of the most successful products to ever appear on the show. But where would Scrub Daddy be today if it wasn’t for the investment from one of the Sharks, Lori Greiner? According to Forbes, before Scrub Daddy was introduced on Shark Tank, it struggled to make $100,000 in over 18 months. Scrub Daddy has now made over $75 million in sales thanks to a $200,000 investment from Lori Greiner, including her time and considerable marketing muscle. Since then, Scrub Daddy has dramatically expanded its facilities and released several new products. As business leaders, we talk a lot about investing in our people, especially in this age of low retention and high turnover. So, what happens when we invest in our employees (time and dollars) the same way the Sharks invest in these companies? We continue to see several recurring trends in today’s job market. For instance, a steady paycheck, bonus, and PTO are no longer enough to satisfy employees. Employees want to feel like they are a part of something bigger than just an office job, and something bigger than themselves. The feeling that they are a part of a team that values them as an individual and respects their ideas. They want someone to invest in them. As the Millennial and Gen Z generations continue to make their imprint on today’s workforce, the “job for life” mentality of their parents and grandparents is becoming non-existent. The younger generations are focused on the concept of belonging to a team that creates value, not merely working for a paycheck. When employees don’t feel challenged, or fully engaged in the work they are doing, employee turnover rates skyrocket. As Richard Branson, the CEO of Virgin Group, has popularly stated, “Clients do not come first. Employees come first. If you take care of your employees, they will take care of the clients.” The discussions around employee engagement have become so prevalent in recent years that you would think it’s second nature by now. It is also no coincidence that in study after study, increasing employee engagement is now the top priority of most CEOs. After all, research proves that investing in the talents and capabilities of your employees is one of the best and most cost-effective ways to increase employee engagement and instill loyalty. The same holds for the investors on Shark Tank. For example, when you look at something as simple as a sponge, you might not see much potential return. However, when you add a little ingenuity, time, and care, you can produce a multi-million-dollar product line. It is the same with your employees. Invest in them, and they will invest their time, energy, and passion back into the company and produce a higher return. When sourcing and interviewing for a new hire, you are putting the candidate in “The Tank.” The investors are Human Resources, Supervising Manager, Project Leader, and the Owner/CEO. The candidate’s resume is their pitch outline, showing a base overview of their strengths, skills, past experiences, and successes. Throughout the interview process, the candidate will begin showing you their behaviors and talk a little more in-depth about their past and what they aspire to in the future. Based on this pitch, the investor can decide if they want to invest in the candidate or keep looking for a “million-dollar candidate.” Investing in your employees also doesn’t have to be a Shark Tank-sized investment. In a study conducted by PricewaterhouseCoopers, the results showed that the top qualities that Millennials look for in a job are opportunities for career advancement and learning and development programs. With that in mind, employee engagement can be as simple as having an immersive and detailed onboarding program for new hires and continual training for existing employees. In a study conducted by Axonify, they noted that only 31% of employees receive formal job training. As Carol Leaman, the CEO of Axonify, states, “If employees don’t have the correct training to perform their jobs properly, they will disengage. This, in turn, will result in work quality, productivity, and customer satisfaction issues.” In the same study, 80% of workers state that it is vital to receive regular, frequent training, so they don’t forget the information, up from 73% in the previous year alone. “Training should not be a dull, isolated event, as employees loathe sitting in long, boring sessions and immediately tune out,” added Leaman. The one thing that all generations in today’s workforce can agree on is that people want training anywhere and at any time, but keep it short and offer rewards upon completion. Yes, more PTO and “fun stuff” are great additions to your workplace and may attract employees to apply, but to get them to stay and produce meaningful outcomes takes more. Views of work continue to evolve. The number of positions, and companies that a person will work for in their lifetime, is increasing. Investing in the capabilities of your employees by providing experiences, and creating mobility, ensures that they are building a lifelong career, not just a pit-stop for some experience before they move on to bigger and better things. Move towards being bigger and be better by investing in your employees to increase retention the same way Lori Greiner invested in the Scrub Daddy: provide them the resources, time, and support they need to achieve their dreams. Like the Scrub Daddy, they will, in turn, be flexible, grow and provide you a high rate of return. SOURCES: wheniwork.com/blog/reduce-employee-turnover industryweek.com/onethird-of-us-employees-dont-receive-formal-job-training
Salary History? Don’t Ask and Don’t Tell
Last July, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed into law a bill that prohibits employers from asking a candidate for their previous job salary history. Illinois is not alone. In the U.S., there are currently 17 statewide bans and 19 local ordinances that have acted against discussing salary history. With more states adopting these practices in the next 6-12 months, the question of “why?” comes to mind. Some municipalities, like Philadelphia, are choosing not to follow this mandate, arguing that taking away this question was inhibiting an employer’s First Amendment right to free speech. The fact remains that asking a candidate for their salary history allows for discrimination and does not always provide the top-quality candidate that companies spend thousands of dollars trying to find. As business leaders, hiring managers, and recruiters, we have to ask ourselves— is knowing a candidate’s salary history all that important? After all, we have a set compensation range (low-mid-high) that we have budgeted for an open position. If a candidate meets and exceeds the requirements, qualifications, and behaviors for the role and fits within the compensation range, does it matter? After all, both the employer and candidate win. Maybe the employer doesn’t get the “deal” they wanted or lower their expenses by getting the candidate for less than the compensation range. The candidate may also get a lot more in compensation than they received in their last position. Is that an adverse outcome? Or could it have the effect of engaging and motivating the new employee to increase his or her performance? Think back to your last interview. You were probably a little nervous being the center of attention, knowing that one key answer could land you a job or send you back to the drawing board. You did your research on the role and knew the range a prototypical person in this position would make, but the company has not divulged their compensation range for the job. Then they ask the dreaded question, “How much are you currently making, or what did you previously make?” Most employers assume these guided questions are to measure compatibility between past and future positions. However, for many candidates, this question feels like a trap. If the current salary is too high, the candidate could be pushed aside for being overpriced or overqualified. Indicate a range that is too low, and the candidate might receive less than the value of the job. There are also ethical questions at work. Shift the Conversation When examining questions regarding salary history, there is an opportunity for labor compliance violations. This question allows for disparate impact, which unknowingly discriminates against a group of people, especially women when compared to men for the same position. According to Business Insider, a Hispanic woman makes 53% of what a white male makes in a given year. These statistics vary by state, as some have enacted policies to close the wage gap, but the average data shows that this gap is still very much alive. Assigning a salary based on past employment earnings continues errors of the past rather than righting a wrong and determining the adequate compensation based on the position and responsibilities it brings. By creating laws prohibiting employers from inquiring about salary history, many states feel they are taking a step toward complying with the Federal Equal Pay Act of 1963 and attempting to close the wage gap. How do we move forward and continue to find ways to make sure the candidate matches the role if salary history is now out of the equation? Carolyn Cowper, V.P. of Performance and Rewards with The Segal Group in New York City, advises, “Shift the conversation to the candidate’s salary expectations rather than salary history, then move on to focus on the candidate’s skill set and qualifications for the role.” Recruiters now feel it necessary to ask the candidate what they think they are worth — taking a net worth of all their talents, experience, and assets that they will bring to a new position. For example, one person could make twice the salary of another but only have half of the work ethic and drive. When you take a deep dive into the backend of the hiring process, we see that salary history tells us very little. In a study done by Workplace Culture, they reported that 86% of millennials would take a pay cut if it meant working at a company with a better company culture. Work-life balance, a culture of advancement, and education reimbursements are often more important than compensation to today’s candidates. As a business, it is in your best interest to find people that share similar values and goals to help grow the company into the future. The Market is Speaking Many states agree that it does not matter how much you made in your past job. You should, instead, be getting paid the market price of the current position. Candidates should take it upon themselves to research the standard salary rate before going to the interview, and employers should also monitor this as well to see if they’re competitive. There are many online sources for these statistics (Salary.com, Glassdoor, and PayScale). Company leaders, hiring managers, and recruiters should ask the question by taking a “Total Rewards” approach: What is your desired base salary? Bonus? Benefits? Vacation? Other rewards (for example, educational reimbursement) and then let the discussion progress from there. As record low unemployment continues, and there are less skilled workers available for more increasingly skilled open positions, there are already hiring and employment trends happening that would have been unthinkable just 5-years ago — retention bonuses, extraordinary counteroffers, and even limiting background checks. Even Non-Compete Agreements are on the block. They are already not enforceable in 4 states (including California), and resistance is growing with a Senate bill introduced last year looking for a nationwide ban. In such an environment, it stands to reason that asking for a candidate’s salary history and other employer-favored actions will become history. Be prepared.
Employee Engagement: “Did I Stutter?”
Poor Stanley. The lovable curmudgeon on the still popular TV Show “The Office” wants to be left alone so he can do his crossword puzzle in the middle of a company brainstorming meeting in peace. His boss, bumbling Michael Scott, tells him to put his game down and join the group. Stanley replies with a firm, “No.” Michael then says, “Stanley, we’re havin’ a little brainstorm session.” Stanley then proceeds to cut him off and says loudly and firmly enough so the whole room can hear it, “Did I stutter?” Michael becomes so embarrassed and flustered that he calls a quick end to the meeting so he can grab a glass of water. The episode continues with Michael and Stanley trying to come to an understanding and better define the boss and employee relationship. Do you think Stanley is engaged in his work? Do you think he is committed and connected to his organization? Do you think Michael may have something to do with that? According to SHRM, executives from around the world say that enhancing employee engagement is one of their top five global business goals. As a critical business driver in today’s highly competitive environment, employee engagement can have a significant impact on your company’s bottom line. According to The ISR Employee Engagement Report, “Companies with high levels of employee engagement improved 19.2% in operating income while companies with low levels of employee engagement declined 32.7% over the study period.” Is it any wonder that increasing employee engagement is a top-five global business goal? A highly engaged workforce is the key to retaining top talent within your organization, driving high levels of customer satisfaction and loyalty for sustained growth. However, how do you know if your workforce is engaged or not? Then once you identify low engagement as an issue, how can you address the problem before your bottom line starts to suffer? Is My Workforce Engaged? That is a good question because we often confuse job satisfaction and happiness with employee engagement. Therefore, the thought goes that if my people are happy, then they’re engaged. However, it is possible to have a happy and satisfied employee who is not actively involved in their work or committed to the company. According to Kevin Kruse, the author of Engagement 2.0, “Someone can be happy at work, but not ‘engaged.’ They might be happy because they are lazy and it’s a job with not much to do. They might be happy talking to all their work friends and enjoying the free cafeteria food. They might be happy to have a free company car. They might just be a happy person. But! Just because they’re happy doesn’t mean they are working hard on behalf of the company. They can be happy and unproductive.” Thus, happiness and job satisfaction are not useful indicators of employee engagement. It could be they have found a comfortable place to “hide” in your organization without the level of commitment and caring that could help propel your company to the next level. Gallup regularly conducts surveys on the topic of employee engagement, and they have found that nearly 70% of the workforce today is disengaged, causing employees and businesses to suffer dramatically due to increased turnover, low commitment, and reduced productivity. How to Address Low Engagement? Measure employee engagement each quarter to provide closer-to-real-time data about how your staff views the organization, their managers (who have a significant impact on their overall engagement), and their roles within the company. The powerful “heat map” it creates shows leaders exactly where problem areas exist as they slice and dice the data into targeted workforce segments (by the department, location, generation, tenure, and more). Scientifically based employee feedback surveys allow you to take a deeper dive into the company culture and pinpoint the root causes of disengagement. By collecting anonymous feedback regularly, it gives teams and leaders real-time insights from scientific data that can then be used to impact change quickly. If you’re looking to bring more meaning to your employees’ work experience and increase employee engagement and productivity, then start acting on a proven and predictive data format. We can help you build an action plan to drive high engagement and performance, which will impact your bottom line and your ability to compete better and win. In August 2019, close to 200 business executives met and issued a statement on “The Purpose of a Corporation,” radically stating that companies should no longer advance only the interests of shareholders but also invest in their employees. It could be a reaction to a changing economic environment and record low unemployment. It could also be that business leaders finally understand the importance of employee engagement. That’s right—Did I stutter? SOURCES: “Did I Stutter?” The Office, written by Brent Forrester & Justin Spitzer, directed by Randall Einhorn, 2008; Gallup Employee Engagement Poll, August 26, 2018; The ISR Employee Engagement Report by Towers Perrin; Engagement 2.0 by Kevin Kruse, Createspace Independent Pub, 2012.
Be an Investor When Recruiting and Hiring
Who you hire is one of the most important decisions and investments you can make in your business. However, recruiting and hiring today is more important than finding a person with the right skills and qualifications. Do the candidates fit our culture and strategic vision? Do they share our values and have the right behaviors to make them successful and provide your company a long-term return? Will they still be around in 5 years? Warren Buffett is considered to be one of the most successful investors of all time and is currently the third wealthiest person in the world. Regardless of one’s opinion of the “Oracle of Omaha,” it is hard to argue with his amazing track record of success. As the Chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, Buffett has inspired millions, while making billions through a philosophy of investing that can also be applied to successful hiring practices in your business. Aside from utilizing financial ratios and other analytical tools to find undervalued companies he can invest in, there are other key considerations that Buffett and many other successful investors look for before making a decision. Never compromising on business quality, taking the long view, and listening to those you know and trust, to name a few hallmarks of Buffett’s investment strategy. Could thinking as an investor also be applied to hiring? After all, when recruiting and hiring a person to join your company, you are making a major investment. That same hire can often be critical for the future success of the company. Time, training, compensation, benefits and other “rewards” for the people you employ are your investments in growing your business and making a return. In today’s low unemployment, low retention “candidate’s market,” approaching recruiting and hiring as an investor may make the difference and lead to better decision making in this critical area. Never Compromise on Quality “It’s far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price.” – Warren Buffett Berkshire Hathaway was originally a textile manufacturer when Buffett first took control in 1962. He later stated that entering the textile business was one of his worst trades ever but kept the name. That experience taught Buffett that “you get what you pay for.” He was no longer interested in buying something at a bargain in the hope of getting a nice short-term return, especially when the long-term prospects for the business look terrible. He chose a path of “value investing,” in which he looks for prices that are low compared to their actual or future worth and often overlooked by other investors. Never compromising on quality can also be applied to hiring. For example, Candidate A is a high-quality candidate that matches all of the skills, qualifications, experience, behaviors and cultural alignment needed for great success in the position. “A” checks off all of the boxes, has been thoroughly screened and you can see a bright long-term future. Candidate B also has many of the same skills and qualifications. “B’s” behaviors and culture fit were not as strong and the references not as glowing, nor was there a projected long-term future with the company. Here’s the kicker— “B” wants 20% less in salary than “A.” How many would automatically gravitate to Candidate B because they felt they were saving the company money or had to stick to a budget? Quality investments yield high returns and increase in value over time, similar to Candidate A in our example. How does this apply to value investing? Candidate B will inevitably cost the company more over time and return less due to low engagement, poor cultural fit and eventual turnover – in other words a lot more than the 20% saved in Candidate A’s compensation. As Buffett has stated, “Price is what you pay. Value is what you get.” Taking the Long View Once asked how long he would hold a high-quality investment he made at what was considered a reasonable price, Buffett answered, “Our favorite holding period is forever.” Embracing a “buy and hold” investment philosophy, many of his investments have been held for decades. Buffett and investors care more about the future price than the value it was on the day it was purchased. As a business leader, you should care more about what a new hire can bring you a few years into the future instead of having them be able to “hit the ground running” and automatically start making returns on day one. Look for those candidates who are quick learners and can innovatively solve problems. They are the ones that have the experience and behaviors that will help them integrate quickly into your company and excel in the future. Smart investors also continue to invest – just as companies need to keep investing in their people. While you may not have the budget to increase their compensation, look for other ways to invest in your new hires and current top talent and leadership. In a recent Udemy “Workplace Boredom Report,” 46% of employees are looking to leave their companies because of a lack of opportunity to learn new skills, and 80% agree that being given more opportunities to learn new skills would make them more interested and engaged in their work. Do you offer continuing education, seminars, training programs and other developmental programs that will keep your employees learning new skills? There is a measurable ROI to upskilling your employees, and often it is in the form of productivity gains, increased engagement, more profitability and reduced turnover. Listen to Those You Know and Trust “Management changes, like marital changes, are painful, time-consuming, and chancy.” – Warren Buffett Warren Buffett has always noted the importance of only investing in competent and trustworthy management teams. He knows that when he selects partners or managers, their actions and decisions will be felt for many years. As a business leader, you too must be cognizant of selecting competent and trustworthy people to join your organization. They
