Exit Planning: It can wait until tomorrow, right?
When asked about succession or exit planning, have you given one of these responses? “I think I will leave my business in three to five years.” “The operation still needs me.” “The business is not ready to be transitioned.” “We are too busy to worry about succession.” “I will easily sell it in a few years and walk away.” “I am just not ready yet.” Or perhaps you know someone who has given one of these answers when discussing their potential exit from the business and retirement? Like starting an exercise program, exit planning can easily wait until tomorrow. However, for the Baby Boomers, tomorrow is here. Business owners born between 1945 and 1964 make up 25% of the population but own over 60% of the small businesses. The high ownership levels result from their surge into the job market in the 1970s and the lack of room in corporate America to absorb a much larger and better-educated employee population. From 1975 until the mid-1980s, Baby Boomers opened new businesses at a rate never seen before and not duplicated since. Today, over 5,000,000 Baby Boomers are preparing for retirement. Just as when they all went to college, started new businesses, and became prolific consumers, they will create a flood of small business sales in the United States. So, what is exit planning, and why should you do it? Also, how do you do it, and when should you start? Exit Planning: What is it and Why do it? When a business broker creates an “exit plan,” it usually involves listing the business for sale to a third party. An attorney’s planning focuses on the legal documents that allow the transition of a company’s assets to new ownership. An accountant or financial planner will look closely at tax and inheritance issues, and an insurance broker offers products that reduce the risk of interruption or disaster. It is logical then that exit planning is quickly becoming a significant focus of the legal and financial communities. Although boomers are healthier than prior generations, they all have to retire eventually. Tens of thousands of professional advisors are positioning themselves to provide tax, risk management, wealth management, and contract preparation services to this flood of sellers. You may be in your 40s and 50s and maybe thinking that this doesn’t apply to you. After all, you have plenty of time. However, the answer to that question is another question: then why buy life insurance? Anything can happen to any of us at any time. Exit planning is another form of insurance— just as you are making sure your family is being cared for, don’t you want the same for your business and employees? There are many additional benefits to starting exit planning early— the process of getting your business transition ready means making it more attractive to investors. That includes, but is not limited to: maximizing revenue, lowering expenses, increasing efficiencies, eliminating owner-centric processes, getting the business modernized, up-to-speed, and more profitable. All of these will have tremendous benefits for you and your company regardless of your exit timing. Examining the strengths and weaknesses of the business, IT systems, management team, and customer base are good continual improvement practices that make the company more profitable in the short-term and make it much more attractive for a potential buyer. How to Plan Your Exit? A successful transition starts by determining the planned date of exit and the post-tax proceeds required from the business to satisfy the owner. The target proceeds should be achievable in the chosen time frame. If they are not, you can extend the time frame or reduce the financial goal. After determining schedules and financial information, there are essentially three options on whom will take over as an owner: a family member, an internal team sale, or a third-party sale. Discussions with accountants, attorneys, financial planners, and others likely feel similar to a complicated maze that makes you not even want to start the process. A trained advisor will help initiate the process and will engage in constant communication with all of the parties listed above, with your control of the process remaining intact. The most effective and efficient approach to exit planning is to select a single professional who can manage all the others involved. Creating new entities or sale agreements is pointless unless the tax implications are first understood. Planning to reduce the impact of income taxes may be rendered moot if a company is not in a position to sell. Putting the company up for sale may be a disaster if an owner doesn’t understand what buyers are looking for and how much they’re willing to pay. Not only will this process determine the best options for your eventual exit from your business, but it also provides a screenshot of the company. It helps to identify areas of the organization that can be improved and what we can outsource to others to achieve the highest sale value possible. Eventually, the planning also leads to a smooth transition, operationally, so that your business continues to be run in the best manner possible by new leadership. When to Start? Retiring Boomers will outnumber GenXers reaching ownership age by 4,000 a day! Studies show that the generation reaching retirement age is 2.5 times more likely to want to own a business than those in their 30’s and 40’s. Thus, this severely limits the small-business buyers in our economy today. It often takes a minimum of 5 years to develop most succession and exit plans—a more realistic number might be as much as ten years. Time and potential buyers will likely be the two most significant challenges for you in this process. Once you have a plan in place, you can implement it whenever you chose. Why wait until it is too late? Get the conversation started with the correct parties now. Are you ready? The single largest transaction and transition of your life deserves special attention. Are you planning to exit
Should You Expect a Thank You Note After the Interview?
Last April, Jessica Liebman, the Executive Managing Editor of Insider Inc., had the sheer audacity to suggest in a Business Insider article that she has a simple rule when she is hiring. “We shouldn’t move a candidate to the next stage in the interview process unless they send a thank-you email.” Liebman went on to state that bringing someone into your company is always risky. However, a thank you email (not snail mail – too slow) signals a candidate’s motivation and desire for the position and generally means they’re a “good egg.” There are only so many data points one can collect in an interview, she reasoned, that sometimes the thank-you note will make the difference in the selection of candidates. She further clarified and stated, “To be clear, a thank-you note does not ensure someone will be a successful hire. But using the thank-you email as a barrier to entry has proved beneficial, at least at my company.” So it makes sense, right? Nope. Unfortunately, it is 2019, and social media and the Twitter-verse went into hyperdrive to condemn her and her statements. Other hiring managers, reputable organizations (SHRM and LinkedIn), and publications joined the fray, with several siding in large part with those who disagreed. It got so bad, Liebman followed up with another article cheekily titled, “Thank you for reading my story about thank-you notes!” a few days later to clarify what she meant. Many people were seemingly offended that anyone would actually “require” sending a thank you note after an interview. She went on to explain she was trying to be helpful and shed some light and that, “The biggest factors we consider are a candidate’s talent and fit for the role.” It was a “rule of thumb” and not official company policy. What were the disagreements and the outrage with Jessica Liebman’s piece on sending thank you notes? Thank you notes are antiquated and pointless [apparently not to her and the many hiring managers and business leaders we talk to daily here at BEST]. Thank you notes are to stroke the ego of the interviewer. Seriously? The application and job description said nothing about sending a thank you. Liebman’s response was priceless on this point, “Neither is being on time to the interview.” Our favorite? Expecting a thank-you note is elitist and shows discrimination and bias because many people have never been taught this skill. Diversity is critical to any organization today. Different perspectives can lead to increased creativity, innovation, productivity, better decision-making, and a better work environment and culture, among many other benefits. However, we have never seen it be used as an excuse not to be courteous and to say thank you. Laziness would be a better excuse. After all, especially in a customer-facing role, would you want anyone on your team that doesn’t know how to say thank you? But it’s a candidate’s market. They [interviewer] should be sending the candidate a thank you. Liebman conceded this point somewhat in that all companies need to do a better job notifying candidates and letting them know why they did not get the position. Point well taken, and it is also something we strive for at BEST. A lot of the outrage on this could be the times we live in – where being contrary on social media is expected and merely aiming for “likes” and that all-important re-tweet. Indeed, social media can help us all whittle down the candidate pool. However, at BEST, we can only speak to our own experience working with clients and candidates and heartily thank those who disagree (because it is indeed helpful). As business leaders, hiring managers, and recruiters, it is often about overcoming buyer’s remorse. When a hiring manager or company leader is getting ready to make a hiring decision, they want that one thing that can put a candidate over the edge and calm their fears about making a bad hire. In talking with a client last month, he mentioned that he really liked the candidate, but he had not yet seen a thank you email. The next day he did without our prompting, and the job offer went out shortly after that. To the client, it was expected as well as another box to check. For the candidates we work with, our resources stress the importance of the thank you email. A candidate should always ask for the interviewer’s email address during the interview (whether on the phone or in person). Rarely, if ever, has it been questioned. After all, it is another opportunity to sell yourself to the prospective company. It doesn’t have to be a long note— say thank you, say that you want the position, and use it also to state why you are the best fit for the role (one or two reasons you are the best candidate for the job or maybe there was something you missed during the interview) and would welcome further discussion. Then, send it within 24-hours while you are still fresh in the interviewer’s mind. Where is the controversy in that? When we were hiring an intern at BEST last year, we had three strong candidates, all with equal skills, talent, and fit for the role. The deciding factor? One candidate went over and above and sent us all a personalized thank you email. He was hired and then became a permanent fixture on our team and has been very successful to date and has a bright future. The difference? His thank-you email. As record low unemployment continues and less skilled workers are available for more increasingly skilled open positions, there are already hiring and employment trends that would have been unthinkable just five years ago. So, as we enter the holiday season, a time for giving thanks and reflection, here is hoping the time-honored thank you note is not one of them. Thank you for reading, and thank you, Jessica!
Salary History? Don’t Ask and Don’t Tell
Last July, Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker signed into law a bill that prohibits employers from asking a candidate for their previous job salary history. Illinois is not alone. In the U.S., there are currently 17 statewide bans and 19 local ordinances that have acted against discussing salary history. With more states adopting these practices in the next 6-12 months, the question of “why?” comes to mind. Some municipalities, like Philadelphia, are choosing not to follow this mandate, arguing that taking away this question was inhibiting an employer’s First Amendment right to free speech. The fact remains that asking a candidate for their salary history allows for discrimination and does not always provide the top-quality candidate that companies spend thousands of dollars trying to find. As business leaders, hiring managers, and recruiters, we have to ask ourselves— is knowing a candidate’s salary history all that important? After all, we have a set compensation range (low-mid-high) that we have budgeted for an open position. If a candidate meets and exceeds the requirements, qualifications, and behaviors for the role and fits within the compensation range, does it matter? After all, both the employer and candidate win. Maybe the employer doesn’t get the “deal” they wanted or lower their expenses by getting the candidate for less than the compensation range. The candidate may also get a lot more in compensation than they received in their last position. Is that an adverse outcome? Or could it have the effect of engaging and motivating the new employee to increase his or her performance? Think back to your last interview. You were probably a little nervous being the center of attention, knowing that one key answer could land you a job or send you back to the drawing board. You did your research on the role and knew the range a prototypical person in this position would make, but the company has not divulged their compensation range for the job. Then they ask the dreaded question, “How much are you currently making, or what did you previously make?” Most employers assume these guided questions are to measure compatibility between past and future positions. However, for many candidates, this question feels like a trap. If the current salary is too high, the candidate could be pushed aside for being overpriced or overqualified. Indicate a range that is too low, and the candidate might receive less than the value of the job. There are also ethical questions at work. Shift the Conversation When examining questions regarding salary history, there is an opportunity for labor compliance violations. This question allows for disparate impact, which unknowingly discriminates against a group of people, especially women when compared to men for the same position. According to Business Insider, a Hispanic woman makes 53% of what a white male makes in a given year. These statistics vary by state, as some have enacted policies to close the wage gap, but the average data shows that this gap is still very much alive. Assigning a salary based on past employment earnings continues errors of the past rather than righting a wrong and determining the adequate compensation based on the position and responsibilities it brings. By creating laws prohibiting employers from inquiring about salary history, many states feel they are taking a step toward complying with the Federal Equal Pay Act of 1963 and attempting to close the wage gap. How do we move forward and continue to find ways to make sure the candidate matches the role if salary history is now out of the equation? Carolyn Cowper, V.P. of Performance and Rewards with The Segal Group in New York City, advises, “Shift the conversation to the candidate’s salary expectations rather than salary history, then move on to focus on the candidate’s skill set and qualifications for the role.” Recruiters now feel it necessary to ask the candidate what they think they are worth — taking a net worth of all their talents, experience, and assets that they will bring to a new position. For example, one person could make twice the salary of another but only have half of the work ethic and drive. When you take a deep dive into the backend of the hiring process, we see that salary history tells us very little. In a study done by Workplace Culture, they reported that 86% of millennials would take a pay cut if it meant working at a company with a better company culture. Work-life balance, a culture of advancement, and education reimbursements are often more important than compensation to today’s candidates. As a business, it is in your best interest to find people that share similar values and goals to help grow the company into the future. The Market is Speaking Many states agree that it does not matter how much you made in your past job. You should, instead, be getting paid the market price of the current position. Candidates should take it upon themselves to research the standard salary rate before going to the interview, and employers should also monitor this as well to see if they’re competitive. There are many online sources for these statistics (Salary.com, Glassdoor, and PayScale). Company leaders, hiring managers, and recruiters should ask the question by taking a “Total Rewards” approach: What is your desired base salary? Bonus? Benefits? Vacation? Other rewards (for example, educational reimbursement) and then let the discussion progress from there. As record low unemployment continues, and there are less skilled workers available for more increasingly skilled open positions, there are already hiring and employment trends happening that would have been unthinkable just 5-years ago — retention bonuses, extraordinary counteroffers, and even limiting background checks. Even Non-Compete Agreements are on the block. They are already not enforceable in 4 states (including California), and resistance is growing with a Senate bill introduced last year looking for a nationwide ban. In such an environment, it stands to reason that asking for a candidate’s salary history and other employer-favored actions will become history. Be prepared.
All’s Fair in Love and Retention
Employee retention can seem like war in the current candidate market, but it doesn’t have to be. Often, when top-grade managers leave their organization, it is because of reasons that could be addressed by company leadership and have little to do with salary. In our own internal surveys that we use with candidates, “Company Culture” is the number one motivation for making a career move. As recruiters, we often see candidates willing to take up to a 20-25% cut in base pay for an opportunity that provides more of a challenge, a better company culture, more work/life balance, and a “runway” to their future goals. To get your people to stay, you may be thinking, “Well, I’ll just increase their compensation and that should do it.” Or – when presented with an employee that is leaving, “I will make him a counteroffer he can’t refuse.” Worst case, your budget may not allow for it. Best case, you may get another year or two out of the employee, but the underlying issues for them wanting to leave still remain. The good news is that it is not just about compensation. The bad news is that if you’re not taking steps to address employee retention and understand why your talent is leaving, it is open season on your people. We have identified many clients and companies we work with that have excellent employee retention, and they all share the same four components that we call L-O-V-E (L for Learning and Development programs, O for a great Onboarding experience, V for Values and Culture, and E for Engagement). Thus, when it comes to retention, think about making LOVE, not War. Learning and Development How many of us have said to ourselves at points in our career, ”Did I learn anything new today or was it just another day at the mill?” Learning and development programs are proven ways to boost engagement and loyalty. According to Ellie Bertani, Director of HR Strategy and Innovation at Walmart, “I believe business needs to stop looking at employees as a cost center and realize they are an investment. Training them is an investment that will pay dividends in the future.” There are external factors at work as well. According to Niall McKinney, president of AVADO, “As more jobs become automated, employers need to help employees re-deploy in new or more advanced areas. Around 32% of current workers ages 16-54, regardless of their position, may need to retrain within the next 12 years. Research also shows that workers are leaving your company because they don’t see the career path and opportunity they’re looking for. They may have higher expectations, or they simply need guidance. They also may have been thrown into a position without proper onboarding or training and are learning simply by making mistakes, which can be soul-crushing. In a recent Udemy “Workplace Boredom Report,” 46% of employees are looking to leave their companies because of a lack of opportunity to learn new skills. This is where a more experienced counterpart or mentor can provide the training, skills, career/life guidance, coaching, and patience that can help them learn the position, see their fit within the company and culture, and see a future. Do you offer continuing education, seminars, training program,s and other developmental programs that will keep your employees learning new skills? Do you have a portion of your meetings dedicated to best practices or learning something new, or even a simple sharing of information? There is a measurable ROI to upskilling your employees, often in the form of productivity gains and reduced turnover. Onboarding Onboarding is a great tool for welcoming a new team member and first impressions here are lasting. Think about your own career. How many of us on our first day in a new job had to find a temporary workspace since our workstation wasn’t ready? They may not have had our email setup yet and didn’t even have new business cards printed. “I’m sorry, I didn’t get the email that you were starting today,” was often a common refrain. You can feel the love and sense of belonging in your new company, right? According to ServiceNow, 80% of workers experienced some issues when starting a new job. One-third stated they received no training at all, while 28% were unsure of their responsibilities and goals. 20% felt they were not fully onboarded after three months on the job! In fact, that same 80% would rather go on an awkward first date than attend a new job onboarding session or orientation. What do new hires want out of onboarding? In the ServiceNow survey, 58% want a walk-through of key processes or want a “buddy” or mentor they can turn to for questions. According to a recent Harris Poll, 93% of employers agree that a good onboarding experience is critical to influence the new hire’s decision to stay with the company. In fact, nearly 1 in 10 new hires leave a company due to a poor onboarding experience and the attrition rate can be up to 22% in the first 45 days of a new hire. The solution? Have a comprehensive plan for onboarding new hires. Your onboarding may include: a pre-boarding with your new hire (welcome packet and schedule, including a welcome letter from the CEO, sent prior to their first day); scheduled walk-throughs with key department heads; a longer duration for getting acclimated (most successful onboarding plans take weeks or even months); and the assignment of a coach/mentor to help them learn the new job quickly and immerse them into your company culture. Values & Company Culture Company values and culture are more important than ever when it comes to retention. Are you giving people insight into the company’s mission, values, vision and purpose? A good thing to do is write it down, not just have it on your web site, but have it visible throughout your entire operation. According to Bretton Putter, Founder and CEO of CultureGene, “The success or failure of a
Focusing on Youth in Hiring is Hurting Your Organizational Health
In the Fall of 1984, Ronald Reagan, at the time the oldest U.S. President in history, was in a fight for re-election. In his first debate with youthful challenger Walter Mondale, he appeared tired and lacking energy. Many began to question his stamina for the job. In the second debate, he was asked a question about his age and being able to function in tough circumstances and in a crisis. Without hesitation, Reagan said the lines that we wish would be used more by older candidates seeking a job today: “Not at all… and I want you to know that also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.” He never looked back and won re-election in a landslide. Underlying the humor of Reagan’s response (even Mondale laughed at the time) is the truth in his words. Do we, and organizations in general, consciously and/or subconsciously choose “youth and inexperience” over “experience and wisdom” to our detriment and even to the detriment of the younger employees we onboard? Are we missing training, coaching, mentoring, and even reverse mentoring opportunities that would ultimately lower turnover and benefit the entire organization? Is it time to rethink age in hiring, especially in the current “candidate’s market,” and get away from the misconceptions and perceived costs of hiring older workers and focus on the benefits? In Search of Experience and Wisdom “Age is an issue of mind over matter. If you don’t mind, it doesn’t matter.” – Mark Twain Most can agree that experience and wisdom are good things, but there are clearly also times when age and health can lead to poor performance. On the flip side, performance in younger employees could be just as impacted by a lack of training (investment in your personnel), mentoring, and coaching, which could lead to increased turnover and impact the future of your entire organization. We recently placed a 61-year-old candidate into a client who simply couldn’t ignore the fact that she would make the entire department better. Instead of age being a negative, this particular person’s depth of work and life experience, high energy, and continual learning mindset, as well as the fact that she had been a coach and mentor to several in the same field for decades, became a major positive. She didn’t need training— she was going to become the trainer. The client saw that this was a resource that many of his Millennials could tap into, and concerns over age and longevity in the position were overcome. Too often as business leaders, we look for “shiny and new” over “tried and true.” On the flip side, the disdain that many in the Baby Boomers and Gen Xers have for Millennials (and vice versa) is not a new phenomenon. Saying that Millennials are more prone to leaving jobs and switching companies than previous generations is misleading. They leave jobs because they are young and new to the workforce, and there was probably little in the way of training investment, coaching, and mentoring to keep them there and get them through the rough patches. According to Pew Research and a study they did comparing Millennials to Gen Xers, the percentage of 18-to-35-year-old employees who stayed with their employers for 13 months or more was 63.4% for Millennials in 2016 and 59.9% for Gen Xers in 2000. In addition, the percentage of these same groups who had been with their employers for 5 years or more was 22% for Millennials in 2016 and 21.8% for Gen Xers in 2000. It is easy to form generalizations about generations and blame the Millennials for leaving because they do not “have a strong work ethic.” It is also envy, and we have all been there. Ask an all-star major league baseball player from the 70s or 80s if he wouldn’t want the salary of even the most mediocre ballplayer today? What about Millennials just entering the workforce out of college? According to Mike Brown and the “The Class of 2018 Career Report” conducted by LendEDU, 41.3% had already found a job, and of those, only 37% envision staying at that same job for over 3 years. 28% of those who had found a job envisioned staying at their job for up to 3 years, while 25% thought they would last 6 months to a year, and 10% said they would leave as soon as something better came along (click here for the full study at LendEDU). The research indicates that younger workers are leaving your company, not because they are “Millennials.” They are leaving because they don’t see the career path and opportunity they’re looking for, and they may indeed have higher expectations, or they simply need guidance. They may have been thrown into a position without proper onboarding or training and are learning simply by making mistakes, which can be soul-crushing. In a recent Udemy “Workplace Boredom Report,” 46% of employees are looking to leave their companies because of a lack of opportunity to learn new skills. This is when a more experienced and wise counterpart can provide the training, skills, career/life guidance, coaching, and patience that can help them learn the position, see their fit within the company, adapt to the culture, and see a future. Do you have a mentoring program? There is a wealth of company, industry, and subject knowledge in older workers that Millennials can tap into and that employers should value. Programs that enable knowledge transfer and connect younger and older workers have been found to have a high return on investment because of the impact they have on increasing retention rates, promotions, and overall employee satisfaction. There is also a benefit in reverse mentoring in which older executives are paired and mentored in turn by younger employees on technology, social media, and trends. After all, what organization couldn’t benefit from a free exchange of ideas, wisdom, and engagement between employees in different generations?
