Exit Planning: You Need to Grieve it to Leave it
Strategies for the Emotional Side of Exit Planning and Career Transition It was just a few minutes into our phone call, and our clients started to cry. Working on their business exit planning and reviewing the financial and transactional aspects of selling their nursery operation, it suddenly hit them as they looked over a beautiful array of plants in their greenhouse. Their nursery business was their “baby” that they had spent over 30 years growing day and night, and the fact that they were moving on brought tears of both joy and sadness. We empathized with them, and they began to apologize for their emotions and stated they were ready to move on. “There is no need to apologize, as this is all positive,” we said. “You are grieving the business, and this is an important part of your journey and transition to what’s next.” Accountants, lawyers, financial planners, business brokers, and business exit planning specialists all work in the transactional areas of selling a business. They bring expertise in each of their fields that, when combined, are critical to a successful sale or transition. However, what about the tears and the emotions involved in exiting a business? According to an Exit Planning Institute (EPI) report, over 75% of business owners who have sold their business profoundly regret it within a year after the sale. Most of these owners will end up grieving the loss of their business for many years to come. Many say that they have lost their identity and their reason for being – “How much golf can a person play?” How do we avoid this seller’s remorse, and what steps can we take to mitigate these feelings of regret during the exit planning process? We recently interviewed Chip Conley, a noted entrepreneur, author, speaker, and founder of the Modern Elder Academy. According to Chip, “We need to stop retiring from something and retire to something. There are (3) values people take from their company ownership – a sense of purpose, wellness, and community. They seemingly lose all three when they retire, and it can even accelerate their mortality by several years.” During the exit planning process, it is important to plan where the owner will find their purpose, wellness, and community after the sale or outline a personal vision of what life looks like after the business. It helps frame and answers the question, “What are we retiring to?” In addition, when working with owners on their emotional readiness for when they transition, “preparatory grief” or dealing with grief before the event happens is another way of preparing for the day they sign the papers and hand over the keys. In 1969, psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross first identified five stages of grief in her book, On Death and Dying. She noted that those experiencing grief on losing a loved one (and a business can undoubtedly be considered a “loved one” to most owners) go through five emotional stages: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. Naturally, many will argue the merits of the process or disagree with the original and simplistic approach. After all, grieving is complicated, but there is consistency in our experience when the five stages are applied to exit planning. According to Dr. Patrick Downing, a psychologist who has worked with exiting business owners, “Grieving the loss of a business is not a seamless process, and there will be flip flops back and forth between the emotional stages— it is not a linear progression. It is all about finding cognitive strategies to help guide you through the emotions that hit you. It helps steer the emotions in a way to help process a sale of the business.” Thus, we find that exit planning itself can be akin to a grieving process. Denial “If you fail to plan, you are planning to fail!” – Benjamin Franklin There is one indisputable fact – 100% of owners will eventually exit their business. It could be through family succession, sale, liquidation, closure, death, or any number of reasons – many of which are outside the owner’s control. According to the EPI, 50% of these exits will be involuntary, and 40% of business owners lack even a basic continuity plan (should something happen to the owner). When it comes to exit planning, denial is by far the biggest hurdle. When we talk to business owners and ask when they plan to exit, the typical answer is 3-5 years. Ask them 3-5 years from now, and the standard answer again is 3-5 years. Denial is clinging to a false reality, and it plays a significant role in why 70-80% of businesses don’t sell. When we are asked by business owners when they should start exit planning, our answer is always a resounding “NOW!” Whether the business owner is in their 20s or 60s, we have never heard clients complain that they spent too much time planning. On the contrary, planning leads to business optimization, better decision-making, and less owner-centricity, all of which will drive up value in a buyer’s eyes. According to John Dini, author of Your Exit Map, “Five years is a reasonable planning time. Ten years is better. There is no time frame that’s too far out to be thinking about your exit.” Many owners can get stuck in denial indefinitely. We recently had a 72-year-old client tell us he wanted to delay the start of his business exit planning for at least six months, even over his wife’s objections, because he was just too busy. Certainly not what a potential buyer wants to hear. Overcoming denial is not easy, and it takes a lot of time, effort, and focusing on the bigger picture. We start with a preparedness assessment and a valuation because denial often manifests itself in postponing a departure and what an owner perceives as the fair market value for his/her business. How can one get past denial? Examine your fears, think about the consequences of doing nothing, and identify the irrational beliefs and your reality. Most importantly, talk to someone— a trusted
Rethinking Hiring in Horticulture
Effective Strategies for Post-Pandemic Hiring in the Horticulture Industry By Benjamin Molenda & Harrison Downing, Human Capital Advisors at BEST Human Capital & Advisory Group Are you excited at the prospect of increased demand in the Horticulture Industry over the next few years? But, on the other hand, are you concerned that you will struggle to supply material to meet consumer demand? You are not alone in these thought processes. Most companies are identifying areas to invest increased revenue in satisfying new requirements. Whether through R&D, new market channels, LEAN manufacturing approaches, supply chain amelioration, or bringing on talent for these and additional departments. When hiring in today’s changing climate, it is important to understand options, strategize a plan, and develop expectations, as the industry’s talent pool is critically thin compared to talent needs. The Process Scheduling interviews can be complicated, especially acknowledging that not only are your team members busy with their responsibilities, but the prospective candidate is likely busy in their current role. The chances of finding a quality applicant who is currently unemployed are slim. Thus, it is imperative to be realistic when setting a start date for a new hire. The traditional “2 weeks’ notice” is often satisfactory. However, occasionally, more time is required for the individual to leave their previous employer, potentially your same customers, and put them in a position for success. None of us want to burn any bridges. It is now a commonly accepted, if not begrudged, belief that quality professionals are not frequenting job boards and applying to postings. In discussions with many companies, posting a job is often more about marketing than actually identifying candidates. Utilizing current relationships to network opportunities, involving HR teams and other departments to brainstorm candidate flow, and inquiring with customers or suppliers on star players they interact with are among the options to identify talent in our close-knit industry. The graphic at right represents a recent mid-level position hire. The hiring project timeline included posting job descriptions on job boards, networking with industry leaders, and actively sourcing candidates through executive search. At a minimum, it typically takes (3) weeks to identify qualified individuals, (3) weeks to interview and offer, and (3) weeks for the individual to transition and start in their new role. For senior-level positions, plan to add a minimum of (2) weeks for each of the three steps. Because of this dynamic and the budgeting process, many companies start their hiring process a year in advance to identify what roles are needed in their organization. Hiring from within is a practical approach as it is quick, cost-effective, fluid with the company culture, and can motivate loyal employees who aspire to grow professionally. These items add up to expose less risk than hiring externally. However, internal promotion is not always the best option. Animosity between internal applicants can arise, leading team members not chosen to question loyalty. Another critical element to hiring from within is succession planning. As one hole is filled, another is created in the previous position. Active cross-training prepares team members for succession, strengthens the organizational chart, and motivates the team. Finally, from a legal and efficacy standpoint, a hybrid approach of external search and looking within ensures all available talent is vetted as there is a lack of candidates in our industry. Positions in Operations, R&D, Supply Chain, eCommerce, Analytics, and Sales are being created as companies match changing markets with innovation. Yet, retirement rates are increasing, reducing what is already a thin talent pool for horticulture. Add to this that CEA, Cannabis, and Hemp are hiring from the same talent pool as Ornamental, Nursery, Landscaping, Turf, and Greenhouse – there is indeed a growing talent gap. Casting a broad and flexible net when sourcing talent is crucial. One strategy includes considering all candidates, regardless of age. Another is compromising the amount of required product knowledge, customer relationships, or years of experience and instead focusing on a professional’s behaviors. This option requires increased front-end work through strategic planning and assessments. However, it will ultimately unlock a lucrative talent pool, allow for culture alignment, and increase productivity based on the candidate’s behaviors. We should not ignore experience and product knowledge. Painting a “purple squirrel” (what we call a perfect candidate) is an important thought project when conceptualizing a position, but how many purple squirrels have you seen? If there are (5) “boxes” that you believe must be checked for a role, it may be worth reducing it to a top (3). If a candidate shows strong behaviors, perhaps they can achieve the (2) boxes they cannot check with proper training and management. Conversely, it is nearly impossible to train or manage behaviors as they are set early in life. Behavior-based hiring dramatically opens the talent pool outside of the industry for the right fit. There will be repetitive conversations in interviews, but developing separate focus areas for each interviewer is integral to moving quickly. This approach also gives the prospect an understanding of potential interactions with the interviewer. Continuing to utilize virtual meeting resources early in the interview process allows for flexibility. One-on-one interviews with senior leaders are expected, but interview teams of 2-3 display company culture for the candidate and expedite the process. Once in interviews, an element to consider is how the candidate will be led based on their personality and responsibilities. The initial conversation with a candidate may be the most important. Spend it listening and learning. Listen 80% of the time and speak 20% of the time. Engage them about experiences, listen to what motivates them professionally, and focus on behaviors illustrated when describing achievements. Do not oversell the position or company as there is no perfect job or company. Accentuate the positives but be transparent about challenges and difficulties in the role. Truly understanding your prospect’s personality traits and professional behaviors will create a stronger relationship leading to higher buy-in, more productivity, and continued transparency. Congratulations, you have hired a strong professional! However, the process of engaging them
Employee Pay in Focus: Transactional vs Strategic Pay Practices
Differences abound between transactional and strategic human resources, but even if the distinctions are clear to HR generalists, these terms get a little fuzzy when it comes to employee pay matters. Nonetheless, it’s important to understand the distinctions as these can be important to establishing the right pay practices and policies to keep your organization market-competitive. Let’s look at some critical differences between transactional and strategic approaches to employee pay, and answer some frequently asked questions that can help brings this subject into focus: Characteristics of Transactional Employee Pay Transactional employee pay practices tend to be short-term (or, for that matter, often shortsighted). They address situations but don’t address the “big picture.” They tend to be stop-gap in nature; interim solutions that might still need permanent strategic solutions down the road. Here are some common employee pay situations that are short-term and transactional in nature, rather than long-term and strategic: Hiring new employees just above what they are being paid with their current employer Bringing new employees into the organization at a pay rate above existing employees to make sure the position gets filled Awarding merit increases without performing any proactive analysis just because they fit in budget Utilizing loose descriptions of job functions Using free salary data or letting employees drive the pay narrative with potentially misleading or inaccurate data from the internet Characteristics of Strategic Employee Pay Strategic employee pay practices tend to be longer-term solutions. They take the big picture into account and take the long view toward continuing marketplace competitiveness. Here are some common employee pay situations that are longer-term and strategic in nature, rather than short-term and transactional: Placing new employees in a market-validated pay range and comparing their history to others in the same or similar position for proper pay placement Evaluating and adjusting pay for current employees as needed when new hires must be brought in at higher rates Conducting a discrimination analysis before approving merit increases and address related issues proactively Utilizing job descriptions with clear responsibilities and standards for minimum as well as desired experience levels and education requirements Securing third party published and scrubbed employer data or using a compensation consultant to secure salary data Answering Frequently Asked Questions to Clarify Transactional vs Strategic Employee Pay Practices Question: How can we bring new hires in using the prevailing market range when current employees are below market? Answer: First, think of your pay range in thirds: The lowest third of the pay range would apply to new and untested employees with little to no experience. The middle level would apply to fully proficient employees with several years of experience. The upper third is for seasoned employees with sustained performance over many years as well as a lot of experience. Obviously, you’ll need to have key information to properly place new employees into the appropriate pay range. For example, how much relevant experience will they bring to the job? Three years of experience? Four? None? You’ll then need to consider your current employees and align the new employee’s pay with other similarly situated employees. For instance, if a current employee has been in the job 4 years and came to you with no previous experience and the new employee brings 4 years of prior experience, you should pay these employees approximately the same. If you need to bring that new employee in higher than the existing employee because the market demands it, keep in mind when your merit awards will occur. If they are just a few months away, the current employee’s pay may exceed the new employee’s pay with their merit increase. If you just awarded merit increases, you may need to increase the existing employee’s pay to avoid creating discriminatory pay practices. You may also have to budget an increase for current employees and then execute the pay increases as soon as possible. You could also offer the new employee a sign-on bonus payable in various payments to keep the regular rates of current and new employees aligned. This leads us to the next question: Question: How can we realign existing compensation to market levels with minimal impact to financials? Answer: Tough question. It helps to budget for market-related increases each year. If that hasn’t been your practice and the pay ranges have fallen behind, you might provide increases every six months until you can get employee pay where needed. For employees below pay-range minimums, you can give merit increases first and then make a market adjustment if needed to help them reach the new minimum. Finally, you can use bonus programs, known as “variable pay,” in addition to base pay. Variable pay benchmarks must be re-earned each measurement period based on results. This enables you to hold merit increases in check; this can be important because merit increases permanently increase salary levels as well as benefits associated with base pay, such as life insurance, short-term disability, long-term disability, and sometimes retirement plans. Bonuses, on the other hand, are single pay-outs that do not normally increase base pay levels and related benefit costs for benefits (unless otherwise included per your benefit plan documents). Be sure to check your plan documents to clearly understand the definition of compensation before using bonus plans. Which naturally begs this question: Question: Why is a properly designed strategic pay program important to an organization? Answer: Among the many reasons are that a well-designed strategic employee pay program: Provides appropriate pay ranges for recruitment Promotes accurate job descriptions Provides a basis for determining the external value of jobs to market Provides baselines for reviewing employee performance and rewarding desired behaviors Ensures costs are maintained and managed appropriately Helps reduce turnover through improved employee morale and engagement when pay is not a dissatisfier and there are no pay equity issues The Bottom Line: It’s important to strategically plan your employee pay programs so you can attract and retain your top talent. Recognize that your employees are an investment and not an expense. The time and money it takes
Rethinking Age in Hiring
We recently sent an email to our BEST BRIEFS newsletter subscribers on the topic of ageism, and it definitely touched a nerve. Here is the original email content, followed by some of the comments we received on the subject. Our Original Message On January 20th, President Biden was sworn in and is now officially the oldest President the U.S. has ever had at 78 years old. A few weeks later, a 43-year-old Quarterback, with a 68-year-old Head Coach, and an 82-year-old Offensive Consultant, won the Super Bowl. These events alone should have us rethink ageism, but unfortunately, it is alive and well, and COVID has made matters worse. Studies show that workers ages 55 and older have experienced increased ageism from employers, particularly amid the pandemic. As people start to enter their 50s, they are more attuned to discrimination in the workplace. So much so that 58% of workers aged 50 or older have noticed age discrimination firsthand. Yet they’re known as being the most engaged in the workplace, not to mention the most experienced. Though our article on the topic of ageism (“Focusing on Youth in Hiring is Hurting Your Organizational Health”) was published before COVID, the point remains – it is time to rethink age in hiring, especially in industries (i.e., horticulture) where experience and qualified talent is increasingly becoming difficult to secure. After all, where are the Mentors and Coaches badly needed by younger generations to be found? Comments We heard from several business leaders on this topic, and here are a few of their comments. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Personally, I achieved the most in my 50’s and 60’s: I wrote two of my three books, spoke 22 times across Canada and the U.S. won an award for Best U.S. Speaker in Canada from TEC, a Canadian CEO peer group, won five Best Place to Work and two diversity awards for United Way. I believe that individuals have to shake off society’s negative messages about getting older. We have to create our own “the best is yet to come mindset.” Oh, and my last book was all about companies that have strategies to maximize the creativity, productivity, and value of 50+ and previously retired employees. We make our own luck—and that applies to the organizations that don’t waste this valuable resource! • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • You are spot-on for highlighting ageism! It is the 60-year-old elephant in the room. I have been in meetings where it was disguised as “he/she probably isn’t up to date with technology as a reason for not considering an otherwise qualified candidate.” The older generation invented the computer. We darn sure have the intellectual capacity to learn some of the updates. Also, was there when the “Are you sure he/she will fit in with the younger members of our team?” Ageism comes in many flavors and is very active in today’s job market. Employers are crying for skilled workers who show up on time and give their best but overlook an audience right before them, ready and willing to contribute. Ageism is a cancer in the workplace. My new mantra is: I N D Y stands for “I’m Not Done Yet!” • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Special thanks to those who commented on our piece. If you wish to subscribe to future BEST BRIEFS newsletters, please complete the following information: In this unprecedented business environment and labor market, it may also be time to shift your thinking on recruiting and make an investment to bring on an experienced partner. One that can help you acquire the right talent and put your company in a position to grow. We can help. If your company is ready to strategically address, improve and invest in the hiring of the most important part of any company – its people — contact us today!
Internal Leaders Affect the Value of Your Business
Internal leaders may not be obvious. They may not even have a “leadership” title. Make no mistake, however; internal leaders are critical to value and attractiveness when it comes to selling your business. In Super Bowl 55 we saw the impact of an internal leader. Tom Brady has the highest winning percentage of any single athlete in major professional sports. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers have (or at least did up until this season,) the worst win/loss record over their entire existence of any major professional sports team. Yet one man changed the culture of the organization almost overnight. Remember, for all the accolades being heaped on Brady, he is an employee. He doesn’t own the Buccaneer enterprise or negotiates any contracts other than his own. He didn’t choose the team’s logo, uniforms, location, or coaches. Tom Brady is paid to fill only one of 53 player positions in the organization. There are also 31 coaches on the team, whose jobs are to teach and give direction to those 53 players. Although every player will acknowledge that winning is a team effort, none will argue the impact of one strong internal leader on his 83 coworkers. Internal leaders can be good or bad When I was a very young business owner, I hired an experienced salesman. He was an alcoholic and began inviting other employees to his house for a cocktail after work. It took me some time (too long) to realize that he was plying his coworkers with free booze while he ranted daily about how poorly the company was being run. I couldn’t understand why there was so much resentment among my team. They seemed to resist any direction I gave them. Finally, one person was kind enough to explain to me what was happening. Because this salesman was my top producer, I was afraid of the impact on revenues if I fired him. He didn’t want my job. In fact, he didn’t want any of the responsibility that should go with leading. He had merely discovered one of the biggest truths about leadership. It’s easier to tear something down than build it up. People love to hear that things could be better. It’s making them better that is the tough part. Tom Brady made the Tampa Bay Buccaneers better. Like any good internal leader, he didn’t limit his contribution to his job description as Quarterback. He helped recruit and train the people around him to build a better team. Identify your internal leaders An army dispatches its troops under the leadership of its lieutenants, but it succeeds on the ability of its sergeants. As a business owner, you can inspire with core values and set great goals. Whether you reach them, however, will be determined by your internal leaders. When it comes time for your transition, they are more important than ever. If you are selling to family or employees, they may not expect to be included in equity, but they will determine the acceptance of those who are. If you are selling to a third party, his or her achievements following the sale are conditional on the support of your internal leaders. They can prop up an inexperienced owner, or sink him without a trace. If any part of your proceeds from exiting depend on the continued success of the business, you would be wise to identify your internal leaders and make some provision for their continued loyalty after you are gone. If they don’t buy-in, you could see the value of your enterprise (and your payout) decline substantially. John F. Dini, CExP, CEPA is an exit planning coach and the President of MPN Incorporated in San Antonio, Texas. He is the publisher of Awake at 2 o’clock and has authored three books on business ownership. The single largest transaction and transition of your life deserve special attention. Are you planning to exit and sell your business? Business Exit planning is quickly becoming a buzzword in the legal and financial communities. Your professional advisors position themselves to provide tax, risk management, wealth management, and contract preparation services. BEST Exit Plan Advisor has been trained to manage your team of tax, legal, business, and financial planners to navigate your exit strategy. Click here for our Special Section on Exit Planning for more details and a video on how to get started. If you want to see how prepared you are for transition, take the 15-minute Assessment at no charge: There is one indisputable fact – 100% of owners will eventually exit their business. The Assessment is a multiple-choice questionnaire that does not ask for confidential or financial information. Nevertheless, it is a critical first step in starting the discussion and planning process. Click here for FAQs and more information concerning our free, no-obligation exit planning assessment.
